2,658
Views
75
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy

Pages 61-79 | Received 03 Oct 2008, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

This paper presents results from an ethnography of language policy which examined language policy appropriation for bilingual learners in a large urban US school district. The purpose of this article is to explore the space left by current US language policy for developmental bilingual education and, specifically, the focus is on how a group of educators appropriate top-down language policies while engaging in their own local language policy creation. The process of creating the policy illustrates how spaces for bilingual education are pried open by a community of educators who fostered an ideological space which supported multilingualism as a resource for all students. A strong characteristic of this ideological space is the empowerment of bilingual teachers to take ownership of language policy processes and appropriate language policy in a way that benefits bilingual learners.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to all of the educators in the School District of Philadelphia who participated in this study.

Notes

1. Pseudonyms are used for all research participants while real names are used for those who were not connected directly to the study. For example, the name of the CEO of the SDP is well known. I do not use a pseudonym for the ‘SDP’ or 'OLCA'because I want the work done by educators therein to be recognized.

2. I use the word ‘text’ to refer to productions of written or spoken discourse for the purpose of analysis.

3. It is interesting to note that a majority of the nine senators who voted against NCLB were Republicans.

4. This department is responsible ‘for the administration of new formula grants and for providing technical assistance to State and Local educational agencies’ http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/aboutus.html

7. It is unclear how Pennsylvania policy is defining ‘developmental’ here and why dual language is not considered a developmental program.

9. Unlike Pennsylvania policy, they classify dual language as ‘developmental.’

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.