Abstract
Background: In order to comprehend fully a speaker's intention in everyday communication, information is integrated from multiple sources, including gesture and speech. There are no published studies that have explored the impact of aphasia on iconic co‐speech gesture and speech integration.
Aims: To explore the impact of aphasia on co‐speech gesture and speech integration in one participant with aphasia and 20 age‐matched control participants.
Methods & Procedures: The participant with aphasia and 20 control participants watched video vignettes of people producing 21 verb phrases in three different conditions, verbal only (V), gesture only (G), and verbal gesture combined (VG). Participants were required to select a corresponding picture from one of four alternatives: integration target, a verbal‐only match, a gesture‐only match, and an unrelated foil. The probability of choosing the integration target in the VG that goes beyond what is expected from the probabilities of choosing the integration target in V and G was referred to as multi‐modal gain (MMG).
Outcomes & Results: The participant with aphasia obtained a significantly lower multi‐modal gain score than the control participants (p<0.05). Error analysis indicated that in speech and gesture integration tasks, the participant with aphasia relied on gesture in order to decode the message, whereas the control participants relied on speech in order to decode the message. Further analysis of the speech‐only and gesture‐only tasks indicated that the participant with aphasia had intact gesture comprehension but impaired spoken word comprehension.
Conclusions & Implications: The results confirm findings by Records (Citation) that reported that impaired verbal comprehension leads to a greater reliance on gesture to decode messages. Moreover, multi‐modal integration of information from speech and iconic gesture can be impaired in aphasia. The findings highlight the need for further exploration of the impact of aphasia on gesture and speech integration.
Notes
1. More information about the exact stimulus can be obtained by contacting the first author on request.
2. It is not clear why this participant could not integrate, but given the participant's age, it could be the impact of an undiagnosed neurological condition.