1,544
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Budapest: from socialist heritage to cultural capital?

&
Pages 107-119 | Received 15 Oct 2010, Accepted 05 Aug 2011, Published online: 22 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

As observed by Hughes and Allen (2005). [Cultural tourism in Central and Eastern Europe: The views of ‘induced image formation agents’. Tourism Management, 26(2), 173–183], cultural tourism in Hungary appears to be almost inseparable from general tourism, therefore Budapest has traditionally promoted itself as a cultural capital. However, the emphasis has mainly been on heritage tourism [Smith, M.K., & Puczkó, L. (2010). Out with the old, in with the New? 20 years of post-socialist marketing in Budapest. Journal of City Marketing, 1(3), 288–299] and in the first few years following 1989, socialist heritage was particularly important [Rátz, T. (2004). European tourism. Székesfehérvár: Kodolányi János University College; Young, C., & Light, D. (2006). ‘Communist heritage tourism’: Between economic development and European integration. In D. Hassenpflug, B. Kolbmüller, & S. Schröder-Esch (Eds.), Heritage and media in Europe – contributing towards integration and regional development (pp. 249–263). Weimar: Bauhaus Universität]. Several years later, the globalisation of Budapest means that the city is gradually changing its image to incorporate not only heritage (including that of pre-socialist regimes), but also more diverse forms of cultural tourism to compete with many other destinations worldwide. A combination of methods are used to show the development of heritage and cultural tourism in Budapest, including over 4000 surveys collected in 2009 in conjunction with the Budapest Cultural Work Group on the cultural habits of tourists in Budapest and a content analysis of 20 years of city marketing materials (1989–2009). Evidence suggests that although some creative approaches to packaging and marketing cultural tourism exist in Budapest, the product is still mainly heritage-focused. The authors discuss the extent to which this is the most appropriate form of development for the Hungarian capital. The changing cultural image and identity of Budapest will also be explored in relation to national, regional, and global developments. One of the other key questions is how far the focus of cultural tourism should remain on the national capital in a country where other cities and towns are relatively under-visited.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to Ágnes Ördög for permission to publish the data of the Budapest Cultural Work Group.

Notes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.