1,999
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gender role orientation and gaming behavior revisited: examining mediated and moderated effects

Pages 224-240 | Received 21 Feb 2016, Accepted 08 Dec 2016, Published online: 27 Dec 2016
 

ABSTRACT

The article presents results of a study that examined the influence of gender role orientations on gaming motivations, game genre preferences, and different play styles. Applying social role theory, it was hypothesized that femininity and masculinity influence gender-typed motivations (social interaction, competition, and challenge) and preferences (role-playing and action games) as well as gender-typed behavior (cooperative play and competitive play). After collecting empirical data through an online survey, hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling. Moreover, moderating effects of sociodemographic characteristics (biological gender, age, and educational level) were examined. Findings provide evidence for the existence of gender-typed motives of play, genre preferences, and – mediated by motivations and preferences – gaming behavior. Group analyses support a biosocial model of gender-typed gaming behavior because gender-typing of motives, preferences, and play styles varies in strength and direction by biological gender, age, and educational level.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Claudia Wilhelm, PhD, is a senior researcher at the Department of Media and Communication, University of Erfurt, Germany. Her research interests include media choice, gender differences in digital gaming, social aspects of digital gaming, and adolescent media use. [email: [email protected]].

Notes

1 Criteria such as construct reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) are more appropriate indicators of convergent validity, although Cronbach’s α is more commonly used (Hair et al., Citation2014). Hence, reliability of factors was tested by calculating Cronbach’s α as this criterion is used by other studies using measures such as BSRI (e.g., Engelberg & Melzer, Citation2015; Poels et al., Citation2012). also provides CR and AVE values of all latent constructs. Hair et al. (Citation2014, p. 619) state that a CR between .60 and .70 and an AVE of .50 are acceptable. However, these criteria are not commonly reported in communication research.

2 As bootstrap procedure cannot be applied using the FIML technique in Amos, missing values were replaced by using the EM (expectation maximization) method in SPSS. There were no significant differences in model estimates and model fit.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.