2,633
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Everything’ disappears … reflexive design and norm-critical intervention in the digitalization of cultural heritage

&
Pages 1361-1375 | Received 28 Oct 2016, Accepted 03 Jan 2018, Published online: 19 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

According to narrative trends, digitalization has the potential to deconstruct both power structures and practices of exclusion in society. What we argue here is that this deconstruction is not the result of digitalization alone, it is dependent on how digitalization is done. On the contrary, digitalization has often resulted in reproduction instead of transformation and deconstruction, i.e. digitalization tend to uphold practices instead of challenging them. Being slightly more provocative, what becomes digitalized is often what we can easily capture and understand. Similarly, when we open up for an increased participation in the creation of digital artifacts (sometimes expressed as demand-driven, citizen-centered, or participatory development), those participating in digitalization are often already known; the use of already established contact channels making them easy to reach and connect with. Such logics raise questions about the intersections of norms and power and the potential transformative character of digitalization. The aim of this paper is to, through a theoretical framework combining critical information systems, policy enactment and norm critical design, introduce a reflexive design method to gently provoke norms. We analyze the need to intervene in the everyday practices of digitalization. This is done in an empirical case study of the making of a regional digital cultural heritage portal. The results indicate that digitalization needs norm critical interventions to change existing practices and prevent norm reproduction. Otherwise, as in this case of the digitalization of cultural heritage, digitalization runs the risk of strengthening existing power structures and excluding practices instead of challenging them.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes on contributors

Dr Sara Nyhlén is a political scientist working at Forum for Gender Studies at Mid Sweden University. She has a research interest of power, normalization and intersectionality. She is using a variety of qualitative methods and often focuses on policy analysis and policy enactment. She is currently working in a post doc project concerning migration among the most deprived EU-citizens [email: [email protected]].

Professor Katarina Lindblad Gidlund is a professor in informatics and here research interests are critical studies of digital technologies and societal change. She is appointed by the Swedish government as a member of the Usability Council and a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Public Information Systems. She is a program committee member of International conference of EGovernment (EGOV) [email: [email protected]].

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by VINNOVA [grant number 2014-04573].