2,955
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Nephrology

Economic and clinical benefits of early identification of acute kidney injury using a urinary biomarker

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1281-1289 | Received 09 May 2019, Accepted 21 Jun 2019, Published online: 15 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the budget impact of adding a diagnostic test of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]), which identifies patients at risk of moderate-to-severe acute kidney injury (AKI), to the current standard of care (SOC) in a hospital setting.

Materials and methods: A budget impact model (2017 USD) was developed from the perspective of a hypothetical US hospital system serving 10,000 inpatients annually. The model estimated the impact of assessing the risk of AKI using SOC vs a combination of SOC and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved assay [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] over a 1-year period. Potential cost implications were assessed using estimates for payer mix among patients, diagnostic efficacy, and patient healthcare resource utilization. The model also considered provider adoption rates and the estimated costs of [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7].

Results: Compared to SOC alone, adding [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] to SOC was associated with a $1,855 reduction in uncompensated care per patient tested, which, after accounting for the additional costs of the test ($277), resulted in net savings of $1,578 per patient tested. The findings were robust to input parameter variations, as demonstrated by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, net cost savings to the hospital ranged from $50,308–$3,971,514, or $101–$7,943 per tested patient (mean = $1,710; 95% confidence interval = $1,691–$1,729).

Conclusions: The introduction of [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] as a novel tool in the identification of AKI risk may result in considerable cost savings from a hospital perspective under this model’s base-case assumptions. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings in a real-world setting.

    Key points for decision makers

  • An economic model was constructed to determine the budget impact of adding a diagnostic test ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]), which identifies patients at risk of moderate-to-severe acute kidney injury, to the current standard of care (SOC) in a hospital setting.

  • According to the present model, the use of [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] to identify acute kidney injury risk may reduce costs for hospitals by ∼$1,578 per patient tested.

JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES:

Transparency

Declaration of funding

Financial support for this study and the fees associated with publication was provided by bioMérieux.

Declaration of financial/other interest

LZ, HB, MAB, MM, and ST are employees of bioMérieux. LMS, NYK, MNS, RD, JTT, and JCW are employees or former employees of Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting firm that received funding for this study from bioMérieux. JME peer reviewers on this manuscript have received an honorarium from JME for their review work, but have no other relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Editorial assistance was provided by Shelley Batts, an employee of Analysis Group, Inc.

Previous presentations

24th International Conference on Advances in Critical Care Nephrology, San Diego, CA, February 26–March 1, 2019.