Introduction

Abstract

The realist movement in political thought has until recently been defined as much by its enemies as by its theses. It has often spent more time explaining what was wrong with ideal theory than doing realist theory. This essay argues that realism is entering a new phase, constructive rather than combative. It identifies three modes of constructive or affirmative realist theory (present in this volume’s essays and elsewhere). The first focuses on feasibility; the second revisits the realist canon; and the third shows how familiar ideologies can be defended without appealing to the abstract or abstruse philosophical claims on which they are often sought to rely. The essay does not seek unity where none can be found. It counsels accepting that the family surnamed Realism is a large and nontraditional one in which splits and remarriages are not unknown and many prospective partners raise eyebrows.

Keywords:

• Realism
• political realism
• realist theory
• feasibility
• traditions
• practice
• ideology

View correction statement:

Erratum

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy and the Department of Political Science at the National University of Singapore for generously supporting the workshop that led to this special issue.

Notes

1. An important forthcoming work is Sleat 2017.