Abstract
The paper offers five desiderata on a realist normative theory of politics: that it should avoid moralism, deontologism, transcendentalism, utopianism, and vanguardism. These desiderata argue for a theory that begins from values rooted in a people’s experience; that avoids prescribing a collective deontological constraint; that makes the comparison of imperfect regimes possible; that takes feasibility and sustainability into account; and that makes room for the claims of democracy. The paper argues, in the course of exploring the desiderata, that a neo-republican philosophy of government does pretty well in satisfying them.
View correction statement:
Acknowledgments
Alison McQueen gave me very useful comments on an early draft of the paper, as did members of the Singapore workshop on a somewhat later version. The final paper benefited in addition from the suggestions of an anonymous referee and from those of Rahul Sagar. My thanks to all.
Notes
1. The recent movement, as I think of it, began from the historical work of Skinner (Citation1978) on the medieval foundations of modern political thought, and from his subsequent articles in the 1980’s on figures like Machiavelli who wrote within the republican tradition identified by Pocock (Citation1975). An up-to-date list of English works in neo-republican thought should include these books: (Brugger, Citation1999; Halldenius, Citation2001; Honohan, Citation2002; Lovett, Citation2010; MacGilvray, Citation2011; Marti & Pettit, Citation2010; Maynor, Citation2003; Pettit, Citation1997, 2012, 2014a; Skinner, Citation1998; Viroli, Citation2002); these collections of papers: (Besson & Marti, Citation2008; Honohan & Jennings, Citation2006; Kwak & Jenco, Citation2014; Laborde & Maynor, Citation2007; Niederbeger & Schink, Citation2012; Van Gelderen & Skinner, Citation2002; Weinstock & Nadeau, Citation2004); and a number of studies that deploy the conception of freedom as non-domination, broadly understood: (Bellamy, Citation2007; Bohman, Citation2007; Braithwaite, Charlesworth, & Soares, Citation2012; Braithwaite & Pettit, Citation1990; Laborde, Citation2008; Richardson, Citation2002; Slaughter, Citation2005; White & Leighton, Citation2008). For a recent review of work in the tradition see (Lovett & Pettit, Citation2009).
2. As it happens I have argued elsewhere for both sorts of autonomy, maintaining that the state is a corporate agent (List & Pettit, Citation2011; Pettit, Citation2012, Ch. 5) and that in seeking to promote republican freedom, it targets the achievement of a good that individuals could not bring about non-politically (Pettit, Citation2012, Ch. 3).
3. The two most prominent self-described realists are Williams (Citation2005)and Geuss (Citation2001, 2005, 2008, 2010). For a useful overview and critique of their work see (McKean, Citation2013). But on my characterization, realism also includes figures like Walzer (Citation1981), in view of his opposition to philosophical hubris, and Sen (Citation2009), in view of his critique of transcendentalism, as he calls it.
4. Desiderata 2, 3 and 4 correspond to three debates that Valentini (Citation2012) takes to be involved, and often confused, in discussions of ideal versus non-ideal theory.
5. It is noteworthy that Cohen (Citation2008) rejects the guidance assumption and represents a position that is diametrically opposed to political realism. For a useful discussion see (Valentini, Citation2009).
6. He may have been following Mandeville (Citation1731, p. 332) who had earlier written that the best sort of constitution is the one which ‘remains unshaken though most men should prove knaves.’
Skinner, Q. (1978). The foundations of modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The machiavellian moment: Florentine political theory and the atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Brugger, B. (1999). Republican theory in political thought. New York, NY: Macmillan.10.1057/9780333982303 Halldenius, L. (2001). Liberty revisited. Lund: Bokbox. Honohan, I. (2002). Civic republicanism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203460894 Lovett, F. (2010). A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001 MacGilvray, E. (2011). The invention of market freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842351 Marti, J. L., & Pettit, P. (2010). A political philosophy in public life: Civic republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press. Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Viroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. New York, NY: Hill and Wang. Besson, S., & Marti, J. L. (2008). Law and republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Honohan, I., & Jennings, J. (Eds.). (2006). Republicanism in theory and practice. London: Routledge. Kwak, J.-H., & Jenco, L. (2014). Republicanism in Northeast Asia. London: Routledge. Laborde, C., & Maynor, J. (Eds.). (2007). Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blac kwell. Niederbeger, A., & Schink, P. (Eds.). (2012). Republican democracy: Liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Van Gelderen, M., & Skinner, Q. (2002). Republicanism: A shared European heritage, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Weinstock, D., & Nadeau, C. (Eds.). (2004). Republicanism: History, theory and practice. London: Frank Cass. Bellamy, R. (2007). Political constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490187 Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders: From demos to demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press. Braithwaite, J., Charlesworth, H., & Soares, A. (2012). Networked governance of freedom and Tyranny: Peace in East Timor. Canberra: ANU Press. Braithwaite, J., & Pettit, P. (1990). Not just deserts: A republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Laborde, C. (2008). Critical republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550210.001.0001 Richardson, H. (2002). Democratic autonomy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Slaughter, S. (2005). Liberty beyond neo-liberalism. London: Macmillan Palgrave.10.1057/9780230513587 White, S., & Leighton, D. (Eds.). (2008). Building a citizen society: The emerging politics of republican democracy. London: Lawrence and Wishart. Lovett, F., & Pettit, P. (2009). Neo-republicanism: A normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 18–29. List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001 Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017428 Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017428 Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. McKean, B. (2013). What makes a fiction inconvenient? On the political realisms of Raymond Geuss and Bernard Williams. Political Theory Workshop. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Walzer, M. (1981). Philosophy and democracy. Political Theory, 9, 379–399. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7, 654–664.10.1111/phco.2012.7.issue-9 Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029651 Valentini, L. (2009). On the apparent paradox of ideal theory. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 332–355.10.1111/jopp.2009.17.issue-3 Mandeville, B. (1731). Free thoughts on religion, the church and national happiness. London.