The safety dance: Men without [hard] hats

Abstract

A central tenet in the sociology of risk is that risk-taking is inherently linked to masculinity. Recent research, however, demonstrates gender identity is only one of the many social contexts that influence professional risk-taking. The interaction between the various occupational social contexts – such as social class, occupational socialisation, institutions, and gender identity – contributes to the development of risk-taking occupational identities. These occupational identities are associated with unique understandings of risk which influence whether workers are likely to embrace or avoid risk. While there has been a plethora of research exploring how occupational identities encourage risk-taking, relatively little research has explored how occupational identities determine the types of risks embraced by workers. After all, there is substantial occupational variation in the types of risks workers take. In this paper I draw on data from a series of interviews conducted in 2010 and 2011 with US electrical construction workers to explore perceptions of job site safety procedures to understand how electrical workers view various job site hazards. I argue that the proximity of a hazard to the occupation’s core competencies determines the level of support the safety procedure receives from those within the occupation.

Keywords:

• risk
• risk management
• risk assessment
• public health
• risk perception

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Steven Lopez, Rachel Dwyer, Jens Zinn, Michael Nau, Joseph Merry, Matthew Schoene, Jonathon Vaughn, Rachel Kosla, the Political Economy Working Group, and the reviewers and editorial staff at Health, Risk and Society for their helpful suggestions and/or comments on earlier drafts of this paper.