Script Generation Following Frontal and Parietal Lesions

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to distinguish putative effects of parietal lobe lesions on script generation, in distinction from the better known and established effects of frontal lobe lesions. Nine patients, most with excised parietal lesions, were compared to nine age, gender and education matched normal participants. Eleven patients with excised tumors of the frontal lobe were compared to twelve age, gender and education matched normal subjects. Participants were requested to generate, out loud, scripts corresponding to everyday activities. Half the scripts were relatively more demanding with respect to temporal representation (understanding the time line of events) and the other half with respect to spatial representation (understanding the layout of the actions in space). These two conditions were further broken down into conditions of high and low demands on working memory (reciting the scripts backwards versus forward). The frontal lobe patients enunciated significantly fewer actions overall. They were also significantly more impaired than the normal participants on all tasks with high demands on working memory, and more often, high temporal demands (sequencing and perseverative errors). The parietal lobe patients had significant difficulty in sequencing in all conditions, and manifested no perseveration. Though script generation tasks have been primarily associated with frontal lobe function until now, consideration should be given to the type of activity being scripted as a function of relative demands on spatial or temporal representation, as well as working memory, and the contributions of other lobes ought to be taken into consideration.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was partially made possible by grants to the first and fourth authors from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (Quebec government) and internal funding from the Université du Québec à Trois Rivières and the Université du Québec à Montréal to the first and fourth authors, respectively