Abstract
Practice effects in serial neuropsychological assessment have led to the use of alternate forms to measure change in cognitive functioning. The construct validity of three variants of the Trail Making Test was explored over a 3-week period in a sample of 158 undergraduate students. Using confirmatory factor analysis, a two-factor (sequencing-shifting) model was identified to best represent the data. Latent means structural analysis indicated the absence of order effects, lending support for the construct validity of the three tests. The study provides evidence that the three tests can be offered as potential alternative instruments in serial assessment.
This project was funded by the State University of New York at Plattsburgh's Presidential Research Award. The authors thank Xitao Fan, Timothy Konold, and Cristina Rabaglia for their helpful suggestions and Kristen Buck, Brittany Kruzinski, Maigan Brewer, Thomas Powers, Hunter Sweet, and Gregory Young for their invaluable contributions to the study.
Notes
1The CT can be obtained through contacting the Salthouse Cognitive Aging Lab at the University of Virginia ([email protected]).