Abstract

Objective

Lethal means safety is an effective suicide prevention strategy with demonstrated results at the population level, yet individual-level uptake is less well understood.

Methods

Using automated data extraction methods, we conducted an investigation of electronic health records from psychiatric emergency service (PES) patients from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 at a busy urban medical center in the Pacific Northwest. At each PES mental health evaluation, every patient received a Suicide Risk Assessment during which providers used an electronic template with standardized fields to record lethal means access and other suicide risk factors.

Results

We assessed 32,658 records belonging to 15,652 patients. Among all visits, 69.9% (n = 22,824) had some documentation of lethal means assessment. However, 54.1% (n = 17,674) of all visits lacked some or all potential documentation detail. Additionally, among 59.6% of visits in which a patient had documented access to lethal means, the specific means available were not indicated. Across the twenty risk and demographic factors we assessed, the prevalence of documentation did not vary by any given risk factor and only varied minimally by age and race. For example, when comparing visits which indicated family history of suicide to those which indicated no family history of suicide, the prevalence ratio was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.03).

Conclusion

Despite the high-risk patient population, mental health focus of the facility, and the presence of a standardized tool, lethal means documentation was suboptimal. In alignment with recent recommendations, our findings indicate that additional focus on implementation is needed to improve documentation of lethal means assessment.

    Highlights

  • Fifteen times larger than prior comparable studies

  • Findings demonstrate persistent under-documentation patterns in new setting and region

  • Standardized methods likely needed to improve documentation detail and frequency

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the University of Washington’s Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology for use of their computing resources.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The authors declare no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

We are grateful to the University of Washington’s Population Health Initiative for funding this investigation through a pilot research grant.

Notes on contributors

Anne E. Massey

Anne E. Massey, Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Paul Borghesani

Paul Borghesani, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Jennifer Stuber

Jennifer Stuber, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Forefront Suicide Prevention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Anna Ratzliff

Anna Ratzliff, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Frederick P. Rivara

Frederick P. Rivara, Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Ali Rowhani-Rahbar

Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.