Relationship between Fitzpatrick Skin Type and The Cancer Genome Atlas Classification with Melanoma-Related Metastasis and Death in 854 Patients at a Single Ocular Oncology Center

ABSTRACT

Background

The Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) is an objective method of classifying patients based on skin color and sunburn sensitivity. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a method of determining the prognosis of patients with uveal melanoma based on genetic composition of the tumor. There is no literature studying the relationship of FST and TCGA groups.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective cohort study on 854 patients with uveal melanoma treated at a single tertiary ocular oncology center between April 2006 and June 2020, classified based on FST on a scale of I-VI and based on genetic analysis with TCGA classification on a scale of A, B, C, and D. Outcome measures included uveal melanoma-related metastasis and death per FST and TCGA group.

Results

Patients classified as FST I (compared to FST II and III-V) had higher odds of being TCGA group D (OR 2.34, p = 0.002). Patients classified as FST III-V (compared to FST I and II) had higher odds of being TCGA group B (OR 2.26, p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in melanoma-related metastasis or death comparing FST I vs. II vs. III-V within each TCGA group at 5, 10, and 15 years.

Conclusions

Patients classified as FST I are more likely to have a higher grade melanoma on genetic testing whereas those classified as FST III-V show lower grade melanoma. Despite differences in tumor features and genetic profile with various FST, survival analysis at 5, 10, and 15 years revealed no difference in melanoma-related metastasis or death within each TCGA group per skin tone.

KEYWORDS:

• Fitzpatrick skin type (FST)
• The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
• genetics
• choroid
• ciliary body
• iris
• uvea
• melanoma

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

Support provided in part by the Eye Tumor Research Foundation, Philadelphia, PA (CLS). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. Carol L. Shields, M.D. has had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data.