Notes
3. See Levine’s refutation of C.P. Snow’s influential idea that science and culture, or, more specifically, science and literature, form ‘two cultures’. As Levine writes in his 1987 introductory essay to One Culture, ‘it is possible and fruitful to understand how literature and science are mutually shaped by their participation in the culture at large – in the intellectual, moral, aesthetic, social, economic, and political communities which both generate and take their shape from them’ (5–6).
4. One notes the long-lived BBC natural history documentaries by David Attenborough, as well as the growing popularity of platforms like ted.com, used to disseminate scientific knowledge on a global scale.
6. Wilberforce famously ridiculed Darwin’s theory, culminating in the question as to whether Huxley claimed his descent from a monkey through his grandfather or his grandmother. For Huxley’s version see Leonard Huxley (2012: 268). For a general discussion of Huxley’s rhetoric and the popularisation of Victorian science, see Block (Citation1989).
7. See Huxley, ‘Science and Culture’ (1880) and Arnold’s response in ‘Literature and Science’ (1882); Snow’s ‘The Two Cultures’ (Rede Lecture, 1959); Leavis’s reaction appeared in the Times Literary Supplement in 1962.
8. On graphs and figures in scientific argument and more generally on the language of mathematics, see Bastide (Citation2001) and O’Halloran (Citation2005).
9. See also Atkinson (Citation1999) on how science discourse in the Philosophical Transactions has changed over time.
10. For a discussion of the Royal Society’s ideas about language, thought and style see Hüllen (Citation1989).
12. See also Campbell (1997) and, for a lexical analysis of The Origin of Species and The Descent of Man, Freddi (Citation2008).
14. See Freddi’s (Citation2011) analysis of analogical reasoning in Richard Feynman’s lectures on physics.
15. In his study of historical examples, Myers (Citation1989) has highlighted the use of dialogue for didactic purposes, as in Maria Edgeworth’s Harry and Lucy, which uses a fictionalised teaching scenario and stages its characters as representing ‘ignorance and knowledge: the learner who knows nothing, and the teacher who knows everything’ (174). On the forms of science popularisation, see also Moirand (Citation2003) and Myers (Citation2003).
17. See, for instance, the digitised Walking with Dinosaurs series and the six-part Space series with actor Sam Neill as presenter; both are BBC productions. On early BBC science broadcasts, see the recent article by Jones (Citation2012).
18. See poems collected in Bush’s (Citation1962) and in Heath-Stubbs and Salman’s (Citation1984) anthologies. Verse was even used by scientists themselves: Erasmus Darwin presented his ideas in poems such as ‘The Botanic Garden’ (1792).
19. See, for instance, Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen (1998), which manages to render the difficulties of quantum physics and the uncertainty principle by translating it into a human issue. Consisting mainly of dialogues between Bohr and Heisenberg, the play even plays with the notion of a sober language of science when the two scientists decide to explain everything to Margrethe ‘in plain language’. Bohr: ‘… You know how strongly I believe that we don’t do science for ourselves, that we do it so we can explain to others … / Heisenberg: In plain language. / Bohr: In plain language. Not your view, I know – you’d be happy to describe what you were up to purely in differential equations if you could – but for Margrethe’s sake …’ (38).
21. The relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology are investigated by specialised platforms such as Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology. Founded in 1993, the journal promotes interdisciplinary research on the interplay between arts and humanities and sciences.
22. Given the range of literary ways to speak about science, it is unsurprising that a vast amount of research on literature and science has accumulated. See Schatzberger, Waite and Johnson’s 1987 bibliography; in particular, research has explored the impact of science on literature: see Jones (Citation1966) and Nicolson (Citation1946) on the impact of Newton in the eighteenth century; Beer (Citation1983), Cosslett (Citation1982) and Levine (Citation1988) on the impact of Darwin in the nineteenth century; other aspects of Victorian science and its reception in literature have been discussed by Brantlinger (Citation1989) and Myers (Citation1985); finally, Shaffer 1998 is a collection of essays on literature and science.
23. For an example of this type of work see also Barbara Korte and Christian Mair’s 2010 publication on linguistics and cultural studies.
Battistini, Andrea (2000). Galileo e i Gesuiti. Vita e Pensiero: Miti letterari e retorica della scienza. Milan. Jones, Richard Forster (1930). ‘Science and English Prose Style in the Third Quarter of the Seventeenth Century.’ Publications of the Modern Language Association 45.4: 997–1009. Nate, Richard (2001). Wissenschaft und Literatur im England der frühen Neuzeit. Munich: Fink. Nicolson, Majorie Hope (1946). Newton Demands the Muse: Newton’s ‘Opticks’ and the Eighteenth-Century Poet. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP. Nicolson, Marjorie Hope (1960). The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect of the ‘New Sciences’ on Seventeenth Century Poetry. New YorkNY: Columbia UP. Stark, Ryan J. (2009). Rhetoric, Science, and Magic in Seventeenth-Century England. Washington, DC: Catholic U of America P. Vickers, Brian, and Struever, Nancy (1985). Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth: Language Change in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Los AngelesCA: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library. Brantlinger, Patrick, ed (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP. Chapple, John Alfred Victor (1986). Science and Literature in the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan. Christie, John, and Shuttleworth, Sally, eds (1989). Nature Transfigured. Science and Literature 1700–1900. ManchesterNH: Manchester UP. Martin, Jim R., and Veel, Robert, eds (1998). Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge. Myers, Greg (1985). ‘Nineteenth-Century Popularizations of Thermodynamics and the Rhetoric of Social Prophecy.’ Victorian Studies 29: 35–66. [Also in Brantlinger, Patrick, ed. (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP. 307–38.] Hellman, Hal (1998). Great Feuds in Science. Ten of the Liveliest Disputes Ever. New York: Wiley. Harris, Randy Allen, ed (1997). Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies. London: Routledge. Block, Ed Jr. (1989). ‘T.H. Huxley’s Rhetoric and the Popularization of Victorian Scientific Ideas: 1854–1874.’ In Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Ed. Patrick Brantlinger. Bloomington: Indiana UP. 205–28. Bastide, Françoise (2001). Una notte con Saturno. Meltemi: Scritti semiotici sul discorso scientifico. Rome. O’Halloran, Kay L. (2005). Mathematical Discourse. Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum. Atkinson, Dwight (1999). Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Phylosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. London: Routledge. Hüllen, Werner (1989). Their Manner of Discourse: Nachdenken über Sprache im Umkreis der Royal Society. Tübingen: Narr. Berkenkotter, Carol (2007). ‘Genre Evolution? The Case for a Historical Perspective.’ Advances in Discourse Studies. Eds Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney H. Jones. London: Routledge. 178–91. Swales, John (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Hyland, Ken, and Bondi, Marina, eds (2006). Academic Discourse Across Disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang. Fahnestock, Jeanne (1999). Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford: Oxford UP. Freddi, Maria (2011). ‘Analogical Reasoning in the Teaching of Science: The Case of Richard Feynman’s Physics.’ In The Promise of Reason: Studies in the New Rhetoric. Ed. John T. Gage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 206–22. Gross, Alan G. (1990). The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Gross, Alan G. (2006). Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. Gross, Alan G. (2011). ‘Solving the Mystery of Presence: Verbal/Visual Interaction in Darwin’s Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs.’ In The Promise of Reason: Studies in the New Rhetoric. Ed. John T. Gage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 83–102. Miller, Carolyn and Charney, Davida (2007). ‘Persuasion, Audience and Argument.’ In Handbook of Research on Writing. Ed. Charles Bazerman. London: Routledge. 583–98. Freddi, Maria (2008). ‘Da The Origin of Species a The Descent of Man: Darwin e il “Primitivo”.’ In Il primitivismo e le sue metamorfosi. Archeologia di un discorso culturale. Ed. Gilberta Golinelli. Bologna: CLUEB. 413–28. Calsamiglia, Helena (2003). ‘Popularization Discourse.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 139–46. Halliday, M.A.K., and Martin, Jim R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer. Martin, Jim R., and Veel, Robert, eds (1998). Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge. Myers, Greg (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. MadisonWI: U of Wisconsin P. Shinn, Terry, and Whitley, Richard, eds (1985). Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Freddi, Maria (2011). ‘Analogical Reasoning in the Teaching of Science: The Case of Richard Feynman’s Physics.’ In The Promise of Reason: Studies in the New Rhetoric. Ed. John T. Gage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 206–22. Myers, Greg (1989). ‘Science for Women and Children: The Dialogue of Popular Science in the Nineteenth Century.’ In Nature Transfigured: Science and Literature, 1700–1900. Eds John Christie and Sally Shuttleworth. ManchesterNH: Manchester UP. 171–200. Moirand, Sophie (2003). ‘Communicative and Cognitive Dimensions of Discourse on Science in the French Mass Media.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 175–206. Myers, Greg (2003). ‘Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 265–79. Charney, Davida (2003). ‘Lone Geniuses in Popular Science. The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus.’ Written Communication 20.3: 215–41. Montemayor-Borsinger, Ann (2012). ‘A Metafunctional Interpretation of Hybridity in Popular Science Genres.’ Paper presented at the 23rd European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop, ‘Permeable Contexts and Hybrid Discourses’, University Residential Centre of Bertinoro, 9–11 July. Jones, Allan (2012). ‘Mary Adams and the Producer’s Role in Early BBC Science Broadcasts.’ Public Understanding of Science 21.8: 968–83. Bush, Douglas (1962). Science and English Poetry: A Historical Sketch 1590–1950. New YorkNY: Oxford UP. Heath-Stubbs, John, and Salman, Phillips, eds (1984). Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Evans, Ifor (1954). Literature and Science. London: Allen & Unwin. Carlisle, Fred E. (1980). ‘Literature, Science, and Language: A Study of Similarity and Difference.’ Pre-Text 1.1–2: 39–72. Cosslett, Tess (1982). The ‘Scientific Movement’ and Victorian Literature. Brighton: Harvester Press. Davie, Donald (1963). The Language of Science and the Language of Literature. 1700–1740. London: Sheed & Ward. Eastwood, W., ed (1961). A Book of Science Verse: The Poetic Relations of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan. Ingersoll, Earl G. (1992). Representations of Science and Technology in British Literature Since 1880. New YorkNY: Peter Lang. Jones, William Powell (1966). The Rhetoric of Science: A Study of Scientific Ideas and Imagery in Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Berkeley: U of California P. Nicolson, Majorie Hope (1946). Newton Demands the Muse: Newton’s ‘Opticks’ and the Eighteenth-Century Poet. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP. Beer, Gillian (1983). Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London: Routledge. Cosslett, Tess (1982). The ‘Scientific Movement’ and Victorian Literature. Brighton: Harvester Press. Levine, George (1988). Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Brantlinger, Patrick, ed (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP. Myers, Greg (1985). ‘Nineteenth-Century Popularizations of Thermodynamics and the Rhetoric of Social Prophecy.’ Victorian Studies 29: 35–66. [Also in Brantlinger, Patrick, ed. (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP. 307–38.]