457
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

What does the Dementia Rating Scale-2 measure? The relationship of neuropsychological measures to DRS-2 total and subscale scores in non-demented individuals with Parkinson’s disease

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 174-193 | Received 31 May 2021, Accepted 24 Oct 2021, Published online: 15 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Objective

The Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2) is recommended for assessing global cognition in Parkinson’s disease (PD) by the Movement Disorder Society. However, empirical evidence is limited regarding the degree to which the DRS-2 corresponds to traditional neurocognitive domains (i.e., construct validity) in PD. Thus, this study aims to determine the construct validity of the DRS-2 in a non-demented sample of PD patients.

Method

Patients with PD (n = 359; mean age = 64.50 ± 8.53, education = 14.97 ± 2.73, disease duration = 8.48 ± 4.87, UPDRS Part III motor scale scores = 25.23 ± 10.17) completed the DRS-2 as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment consisting of attention/working memory, executive function, language, delayed recall, and visuoperceptual-spatial skills.Bootstrapped bias-corrected Spearman rho’s correlations andhierarchical linear regressions were performed to examine construct validity of DRS-2 total and subscale scores.

Results

Speeded measures of set-shifting, rapid word generation to letter and semantic cues, and simple visuoperceptual skills largely accounted for variance in DRS-2 total scores. Most DRS-2 subscale scores showed weak relationships with theoretically related neuropsychological measures.

Conclusions

DRS-2 total scores reflect impairment across a range of cognitive domains (i.e., executive, language, and visuoperception), while DRS-2 subscale scores have limited construct validity. Together, the DRS-2 does not appear to have utility beyond screening for global cognition in PD.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded in part by NINDS under Grant T32-NS082168 and by NIA under Grant F31-AG071264.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.