Neuropsychological testimony: Some emerging concerns

Abstract

Recent court decisions may have a profound impact on the ways in which neuropsychological opinions are presented in court. Three such cases are described, with emphasis on a recent ruling establishing the competence of neuropsychological testimony but vesting judgement of the credibility of the testimony with the court. Psychologists seeking to offer neuropsychological opinion are charged to adhere to recognized standards and definitions in representing their skills to the courts and society at large.