ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study examined knowledge sharing mechanisms in coffee IPs and their effect on actor linkages in four districts of Uganda.
Design/methodology/approach: Thirty one respondents from the public and private sector were interviewed using a qualitative approach. Data were analyzed using the Atlas ti qualitative software version 7.5.18 to generate themes for information sources, types and channels. Social network analysis was used to measure the actor centrality positions and influence in the IP network.
Findings: Results revealed seven main categories of actors in the Coffee IPs who shared information on coffee inputs, agronomic practices, processing and markets through three main channels. Level of cohesion was less than 10% which had negative implications on the knowledge flow, trust and collaboration among the actors. Influential positions were occupied by the processors and farmer leaders in IPs in the southern districts of Luwero and Rakai, while nursery operators were most influential in IPs of the western districts of Ntungamo and Bushenyi. Weak linkages within the social networks indicated that initiatives of the actors were fragmented, as each actor acted as an individual detached from the platform activities limiting inter-actor knowledge sharing.
Practical implications: Innovation intermediaries should focus on integrated systemic and innovative approaches to strengthen actor social linkages for knowledge sharing and better platform performance.
Theoretical implications: Actor positions and relationships in innovation networks are critical tenets for fostering knowledge exchange and performance. In an innovation platform, diverse actors are multiple sources for accessing information within a given social and institutional context.
Originality/value: The study contributes to existing debate and knowledge on institutional change in agricultural innovation systems.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge National Agriculture Research Organization and study participants for the time and support accorded to this research.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributors
Damalie Babirye Magala is a Ph.D. fellow in Agricultural and Rural Innovations at Makerere University. She works as a Rural Sociologist at the National Agricultural Research Organisation. Her interest is in project design and evaluation, agricultural extension systems, innovation, institutional governace and adaptive management of multi-stakeholder processes.
Margaret Najjingo Mangheni, Ph.D., is a Professor of Agricultural Extension at Makerere University, Uganda with development experience and research interests in gender-responsive agricultural research, extension, training and institutional transformation; agricultural extension systems and policy. She has led agricultural extension policy and strategic reforms in Uganda; and is a founder member of the Uganda Forum for Agricultural Advisory Services and African Forum for Agricultural services.
Richard Fred Miiro, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Extension & Innovations Studies, School of Agricultural Sciences at Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. His research interests include training and development in agricultural institutions, gender in agricultural research and development, extension systems, gender, nutrition and food systems.