ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This article aims at identifying the individual factors and socio-demographic variables contributing to extension agents’ support for a ToT extension approach.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted using samples of extension agents from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Nigeria.
Findings:
The main factors explaining the support to a ToT extension approach are: the tendency to blame farmers, understanding extension as a participatory process of dialogue and inter-institutional coordination, prioritizing the modernization of farmers’ production, and supporting conventional modern agriculture. The main factors reducing the support for a ToT approach are having a self-critical attitude, prioritizing the creation and strengthening of farmer organizations, having a university degree, and being an experienced extension agent.
Practical Implications:
The results are useful for institutions interested in changing the profile of their extension personnel and in moving away from a ToT extension approach.
Theoretical Implications:
Extension agents supporting a ToT approach assume that they know what is best for farmers without really acknowledging them as experienced individuals with self-determination and rationale of their own. The development of a self-critical attitude, resulting from field experience and reflection on practice seems to play a key role in questioning the assumptions of the ToT extension approach.
Originality/Value:
This is the first study to analyze the factors contributing to extension agents’ support for a ToT approach conducted using a multiple linear regression.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Fernando Landini
Dr. Fernando Landini is a professor at the University of La Cuenca del Plata, and a researcher of the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Argentina. He holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Master’s degree in Rural development. He studies rural extension and agricultural innovation processes from a psychosocial perspective.
Santiago Conti
Dr. Santiago Conti a researcher of the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET – Argentina) and a professor at the National University of Río Negro (UNRN). He holds a Ph.D. in Psychology. He studies rural development processes and social intervention practices from a psychosocial perspective.