Impact of intraoperative neurologic deficits in carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia

Abstract

Objective

Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may experiment neurologic deficits during the carotid cross-clamping due to secondary cerebral hypoperfusion. An associated risk of postoperative stroke incidence is also well established. This work aimed to assess the postoperative adverse events related to neurologic deficits in the awake test after clamping and to determine its predictive factors. Methods. From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a referral hospital that underwent CEA with regional anesthesia for carotid stenosis and manifested neurologic deficits were gathered. Consecutively selected controls (n = 85) were submitted to the same procedure without developing neurological changes. Postoperative complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and Clavien–Dindo classification were assessed 30 days after the procedure. Univariate and binary logistic regressions were performed for data assessment. Results. Patients with clamping associated neurologic deficits were significantly more obese than the control group (aOR = 9.30; 95% CI: 2.57–33.69; p = .01). Lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis and higher degree of contralateral stenosis were independently related to clamping intolerance (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49–0.99; p = .047 and aOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.06–1.50; p = .009, respectively). Neurologic deficits were a main 30-day stroke predictor (aOR = 4.30; 95% CI: 1.10–16.71; p = .035). Conclusions. Neurologic deficits during carotid clamping are a predictor of perioperative stroke. Body mass index > 30 kg/m², a lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis, and a higher degree of contralateral stenosis are independent predictors of neurologic deficits and, therefore, might play a role in the prevention of procedure-related stroke.

Keywords:

• Carotid endarterectomy
• carotid stenosis
• neurologic deficits
• perioperative stroke
• regional anesthesia

Acknowledgements

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

This study database is available in Clinical registry: https://www.researchregistry.com. Identifying number: researchregistry4929. Hyperlink to the registration: https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#home/registrationdetails/5cf4721053761c000cc1c25a/