The idea that location is important in real estate economics is not new. However, the spatial dimension of real estate data is not always taken into account in traditional real estate models. Spatial econometrics is a tool that could remedy this problem. The objective of this paper is to review spatial models and apply them to typical hedonic real estate data. By doing so we gain insight into the size of bias that can occur in parameters if we do not take spatial effects into account. The conclusion is that spatial autocorrelation is present, least-square estimates may be biased and inefficient and spatial hedonic models do explain more of the price variation. However, the choice of spatial structure does affect the interpretation of parameters for variables with which it is correlated, i.e. it is a sort of multicollinearity problem. Hence, uncritical use of spatial econometrics may cause problems in the interpretation of individual parameters.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.