365
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Traditional and innovated gambling products: an exploration of player preferences

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 219-235 | Received 24 Oct 2016, Accepted 16 Apr 2017, Published online: 11 May 2017
 

Abstract

There is concern that recent innovations of traditional face-to-face gambling products may lead to increased harm because of the tendency for innovated products to share certain structural features with electronic gaming machines (EGMs). The VICES framework focusses on several mechanisms known to influence gambling behaviour: visual and auditory enhancements, illusions of control, cognitive complexity, expedited play and social customization. The current study applied the VICES framework to an investigation of player experiences with both traditional and innovated gambling products. Through a series of six focus groups (N = 40) with regular bingo, poker and casino table game players and sports bettors, we examined the characteristics of innovated gambling products and their influences on player experience and the risk of gambling harm. Findings suggest that traditional games are perceived as more social, more enjoyable and less harmful. This was largely attributed to the low social interaction, expedited play and increased potential for consumption that is associated with EGM-type gambling activity. Further, we suggest that VICES, pending some revision, is a valid and applicable framework by which to identify characteristics of innovated products that influence player experience and behaviour.

Notes

1. Although digitized versions of poker exist in some physical venues in Australia, at the time of the present study such products were too uncommon and underutilized to feature heavily in a focus group discussion.

2. Another innovation is the ability to play casino table games in online casinos, though participants’ experiences were too limited for this innovation to feature heavily in a focus-group discussion.

3. Demographics and problem gambling screens represent the 39 participants who filled out a questionnaire. Data presented in the results section include all 40 participants.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.