Publication Cover
Innovation
Organization & Management
Volume 24, 2022 - Issue 1
414
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Essay

Why should i trust your model? How to successfully enroll digital models for innovation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 47-64 | Received 15 Jun 2020, Accepted 20 Dec 2020, Published online: 24 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Digital simulation models have become increasingly important to innovation processes. When used within organisations intent on innovating products, processes or services, the affordances of these technologies can enable the possibility to explain, experiment, and predict complex systems. As complex tools, however, models must become integrated into a social context characterised by differences in technical knowledge about when, how, and why the models are useful. In this paper, we draw on our experiences studying the labour of digital modelling work over the past 10 years to discuss some of the important social mechanisms through which models come to be trusted by stakeholders, and, consequently, integrated into innovation processes. By comparing three very different contexts we show that the work of trust-building requires modellers to create appeals to the credibility of the model’s analysis, the utility of its outputs, and to negotiate unavoidable political issues that emerge from differing values among parties in the innovation process. Revealing this labour positions models as social objects, and leads us to provide practical recommendations for scholars and practitioners who hope to use modelling as a key process for digital innovation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. For details of the research studies that generated the examples presented herein see Woo & Leonardi (Citation2018) and Woo (Citation2019a, Citation2019bx) for urban planning case, Barley (2014, 2015) for Atmospheric Weather Science case, and Leonardi (Citation2011, Citation2012, Citation2013) for automotive engineering case.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [SES-1057148].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.