306
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A conceptual framework for exploring voluntary stewardship programs for land managers as a tool of New Environmental Governance

ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

New Environmental Governance describes the widening over the past five decades of the range of public and private instruments, institutions, and actors available to govern the environment. But implementing New Environmental Governance arrangements has been difficult. This article responds to the call for more context-specific empirical investigations to better understand how New Environmental Governance institutions work in practice, by focusing on one tool in the expanded array of options – non-government voluntary stewardship programs for private land managers. The article applies a conceptual framework to three working examples of voluntary stewardship using a qualitative methodology to tease out key elements of their operations and unpack the relationship amongst three groups of actors – land managers who participate in the programs, organisations that manage the programs, and stakeholders who have an interest in private land stewardship. Important tensions emerge from the research, which revolve around the lack of strategic alignment between land managers’ participation in programs and how stakeholders leverage their influence. These tensions limit the potential of stewardship programs as tools of New Environmental Governance arrangements.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Tony Gleeson, Jock Douglas, Tim Marshall and the people interviewed for this article. Also thanks to Jacqueline Williams, Paul Martin, Andrew Monk, Leroy Paddock and Ben Richardson for valuable comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was undertaken at the Australian Centre for Agriculture and Law as a part of the research project The Next Generation Rural Landscape Governance: the Australian Dimension, supported by the Australian Research Council under Project No. LP110100659, and industry partner Australian Organic Ltd; and an evaluation commissioned by the Australian Land Management Group (ALMG) as part of a project funded by the Australian Government.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.