Scholar and practitioner views on science in environmental assessment

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the views of environmental assessment (EA) scholars and practitioners on science in EA. Fifty-six online survey responses were received, including 35 scholars and 21 practitioners. To supplement the survey data, we interviewed 13 Canadian EA practitioners. The study indicates that EA scholars were more dissatisfied with the quality of science in EA than the practitioners and their perceptions were found to be related to their understanding of science and underlying expectations of scientific practices in EA. This study confirms a gap between science inside and outside EA. Factors contributing to the barriers to filling this gap include EA stakeholders’ different understandings of and expectations for the quality of science, the role of scholars in EA, and the purpose and objectives of EA. These disagreements imply insufficient and/or ineffective communications among EA stakeholders, which should be addressed if a more collaborative arrangement is to be developed for improvements in the quality of science in EA.

KEYWORDS:

• Environmental assessment
• science
• scholars
• practitioners
• satisfaction

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) for distributing online survey links through its normal distribution list and monthly e-news.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.