Unfolding simplification beyond drawbacks: types and reasoning for simplifying environmental assessment

ABSTRACT

The need for simplifying Environmental Assessment (EA), and potential that simplification holds, has not only been raised by policymakers but also by scholars. Despite recent years’ focus and increased push for simplifying EA world-wide – hereunder argued because of the need for accelerating climate investments and green transition – and the fact that simplification is not a new agenda, studies exploring types and effects of simplification remain scarce. Although there is potential in simplifying EA, several concerns have also been raised, including the risk of ‘oversimplification.’ This letter outlines different reasoning behind simplification of EA and further presents a simplification triangle distinguishing between three interdependent types of simplification: Regulatory, administrative, and praxis. The reasoning and categorization of simplification is illustrated and discussed through four Danish cases, which reveal simplification as a multifaceted set of processes for which we need a more precise terminology. The reasoning and types of simplification presented in this letter may offer a basis for communicating the nature of the simplification processes that the EA may be facing – or needing.

KEYWORDS:

• Simplification
• reasoning
• types of simplication
• environmental assessment

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the DREAMS project, Digitally Supporting Environmental Assessment for the Sustainable Development Goals.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research is made possible by the Innovation Fund of Denmark [Grant agreement number, 0177-00021B DREAMS].