Publication Cover
Reflective Practice
International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Volume 24, 2023 - Issue 4
572
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Collaborative peer observation of teaching: enhancing academics’ collegiality and collaboration

ORCID Icon
Pages 524-542 | Received 16 Sep 2022, Accepted 28 Mar 2023, Published online: 08 May 2023
 

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the extent to which collaborative peer observation of teaching (POT) as a process for teacher professional development could enhance collegiality and collaboration among academics. A single case study was conducted to investigate academics’ perceptions of their POT experience in the Vietnamese context. Purposive sampling was applied to select eleven academics at a university. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with individual participants and inductively thematically analysed . The findings show that reciprocal POT and collaborative discourse were perceived to nurture collegiality and collaboration between peers and facilitate their reflection and learning about teaching. Eight participants reported that POT made their peer relationships develop to a collegial relationship due to mutual trust and respect. However, there existed concerns in the peer relationship perceived by three other academics who did not develop collegiality. These findings suggest that to promote academics’ willingness and quality engagement in POT, it is necessary to allow academics to decide on the peer dynamics that work for them. It is also crucial to develop a supportive, constructive, and collegial culture whereby academics value POT as a scholarship of teaching. Further research may need to examine the impacts of potential contextual factors in the implementation of POT.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Notes

1. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2009.

2. The Random House Dictionary, 2009.

3. Pseudonyms were used for the participants.

Additional information

Funding

This research is funded by the University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Notes on contributors

Phuong Vu Nguyen

Nguyen Vu Phuong (Ph.D.) is an academic at University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City. His research background spans from the fields of teachers’ professional learning and development through an evidence-based approach (e.g., teachers’ reflection and reflective practice, beliefs, knowledge, and pedagogy) and student evaluation of teaching.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.