![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
Notes
1 Joan W. Scott, ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, American Historical Review 91 (1986), pp. 1053-75; Corinne T. Field and Nicholas L. Syrett, ‘Chronological Age: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, American Historical Review 125 (2020), pp. 371-84.
2 Sahar Amer, Crossing Borders. Love Between Women in Medieval French and Arabic Literatures (Philadelphia, 2008), p. 4.
3 Jennifer Manion, ‘Calling All Liberals: Connecting Feminist Theory, Activism, and History’, in Jim Downs and Jennifer Manion (eds), Taking Back the Academy! History of Activism, History as Activism (Routledge, 2004), pp. 145-59, at p. 151.
4 ‘Die vorliegende Band motiviert uns, diese Forschungen auf Augenhöhe mit den historischen Akteuren und ihrer Weltsicht zu unternehmen, und sie nicht (nur) den heutigen Theoriekonstrukten zu unterwurfen’.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Felice Lifshitz
Felice Lifshitz
Felice Lifshitz is Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Alberta. Her recent publications include Writing Normandy: Stories of Saints and Rulers (2020); Gender and Historical Film and Television, co-edited with Shiobhan Craig and Carol Donelan (2018; a Special Issue of Gender and History); Salt, Sword, and Crozier: Books and Coins from the Prince-Bishopric of Salzburg (c. 1500–c.1800), co-authored with Joseph F. Patrouch (2017); and Religious Women in Early Carolingian Francia: A Study of Manuscript Transmission and Monastic Culture (2014).