240
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rural Livelihoods in Three Mountainous Regions of Tajikistan

Pages 359-378 | Published online: 12 Sep 2007
 

Abstract

This article uses data from household income surveys to look at income structures amongst households in three mountainous regions of Tajikistan: Gorno-Badakhshan, the Rasht Valley and Eastern Khatlon. The structure of incomes demonstrates the dominant role of subsistence agriculture in all three regions although commercial agriculture is important amongst better-off households in Rasht. Relationships between poverty and household characteristics including access to capital, demographic variables and income-generating activities were examined. It was found that diversification of income sources was an important element in reducing the likelihood of being poor. Low access to land and livestock ownership and large numbers of children are the three characteristics most strongly associated with poverty. Economic activities reducing the risk of being poor include migration and ownership of a business, with salaries and wages being less significant as incomes from these activities are so low. Those families selling agricultural or livestock produce are amongst the least likely to be poor, having a production surplus and access to markets. The poor thus include those who have not benefited from the land reform process, who live in agriculturally marginal areas, have large numbers of children and no migrant labour.

Notes

4 Altitude data were kindly supplied by Chidi Ugonna at Focus USA, GBAO.

3 These high figures are partly explained by the fact that the income variable includes the imputed market value of all agricultural produce plus the imputed value of milk produced by breeding cows owned. Milk of small stock is not included as this is rarely used in Tajikistan. Milk prices are high in Tajikistan and the milk yield was calculated based on average yields for breeding cows and thus produces high incomes for those who own cows.

1 Sum of price-weighted aggregate volume of agricultural production.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Sarah Robinson

This study was carried out for and supported by the Mountain Societies Development Programme and the Aga Khan Foundation, However, the opinions and statements expressed do not represent those of the Aga Khan Foundation or its partner organisations. We would like to thank Alibek Otambekov and Kishwar Abdulalishoev for their contributions and support in the work presented here.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.