Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 25, 2022 - Issue 3
206
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Retrospective analysis of the endometrial preparation protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfers in women with endometrial polyps

, , , , &
Pages 534-539 | Received 12 Jul 2019, Accepted 11 Oct 2020, Published online: 29 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

We aimed to explore the clinical effects of the endometrial preparation protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in women with endometrial polyps. This retrospective study was performed at the Reproductive Medicine Centre of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2015 and May 2018 involving women diagnosed with endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy. The freeze-all strategy was performed in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles followed by FET cycles. Endometrial preparation protocols included: (i) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-hormone replacement therapy (GnRHa-HRT); (ii) hormone replacement therapy (HRT); (iii) natural cycle (NC); and (iv) ovulation induction (OI). Recurrence rate of polyps and clinical results were compared among the four groups. If polyp recurrence was found in ultrasound scans during the FET cycles, the embryo transfers were cancelled. The recurrence rate of polyps was lower in the GnRHa-HRT protocol [2.13% (2/94)] than in the other three protocols [6.15% (26/423), 6.7% (28/418), and 4% (1/25) in the HRT, NC, and OI, respectively; p = 0.038], showing statistically significant difference. Pregnancy, early pregnancy loss, and live birth rates among the four protocols were similar (p = 0.922, p = 0.171, and p = 0.072, respectively). The GnRHa-HRT protocol used for FET in women with endometrial polyps could reduce the recurrence rate of the polyps. In addition, we found that it did not decrease pregnancy or live birth rates.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 81200473] and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine [No. 2012A061400003].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.