Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges

Abstract

Debates regarding donor-conceived people’s rights to genetic information have caused some jurisdictions to abolish donor anonymity. Moreover, voluntary services have been established whose primary focus is providing possibilities to find information about the donor. A less discussed consequence is that donor-conceived people also find information about donor half-siblings: people conceived through the same donor. In the recent climate of openness and online DNA tests, there is an increased chance of finding multiple donor half-siblings. This study explored how donor-conceived people experience meeting multiple same-donor offspring in a group setting. Second, the study investigated donor-conceived people’s need for support when meeting multiple donor half-siblings. A qualitative approach was used. Nineteen donor-conceived offspring who participated in donor half-sibling network meetings were interviewed. Using a grounded theory approach three themes were identified regarding group aspects: (i) defining group membership; (ii) regulating closeness and distance; and (iii) managing group dynamics. Professional support needs in relation to these themes were also analysed. While establishing relationships between donor half-siblings are viewed as generally more beneficial than connecting with a donor, this study showed that these new relationships also come with their challenges, and counselling may need to be refined towards a more specific same donor-offspring relationships’ framework.

Keywords:

• Donor conception
• group
• siblings
• counselling
• sperm donation
• donor-conceived adults

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants for their willingness to share their experiences with us. Furthermore, they would like to thank Sara Latrach, research intern, for her assistance in participant recruitment and data collection. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the support of the colleagues at Fiom during this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.