Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Saxagliptin, a member of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) class of drugs, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in 2009, and has been in clinical use for more than a decade. Since the drug was first launched, much real-world evidence has also been accumulated. The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin, especially its cardiovascular safety, are of particular interest.

Areas covered

This review provides an overview of the safety and efficacy of saxagliptin based on observational studies, pharmacovigilance, and meta-analyses. In addition, with the findings of recent cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), the authors discuss, herein, the efficacious use of saxagliptin.

Expert opinion

Saxagliptin exhibits a moderate glucose-lowering effect and is well tolerated by patients with T2D. SAVOR-TIMI 53, a CVOT of saxagliptin, reported neutral effects of saxagliptin in respect of the cardiovascular outcomes, but did raise a concern about the risk of heart failure. Conversely, recent CVOTs on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have shown a favorably reduced risk of heart failure with these drugs. Also, DPP-4is decrease the serum glucagon level, whereas the SGLT2is increase it. Given the characteristics of the two classes of drugs, combined therapy with the two might be a promising option.

KEYWORDS:

• Cardiovascular outcome trial
• DPP-4 inhibitor
• saxagliptin
• type 2 diabetes
• SGLT2 inhibitor

Drug summary box

Table

Pharmaprojects - copyright to Citeline Drug Intelligence (an Informa business). Readers are referred to Informa-Pipeline (http://informa-pipeline.citeline.com) and Citeline (http://informa.citeline.com).

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript was not funded.