Evaluation of cardiovascular and renal outcomes with ertugliflozin: what is the VERdict from the VERTIS-CV trial?

ABSTRACT

Introduction

A growing number of antidiabetic agents have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits in cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), despite such trials being principally required to rule out excess cardiovascular risk.

Areas covered

This article addresses the Evaluation of Ertugliflozin Efficacy and Safety Cardiovascular Outcomes (VERTIS-CV) trial, its background, design, results, and implications. In patients at least 40 years of age with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the VERTIS-CV trial demonstrated ertugliflozin was non-inferior to placebo for major adverse cardiovascular events, though not superior. Ertugliflozin significantly reduced hospitalization for heart failure compared to placebo. The composite renal outcome was not significantly different between groups. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated with a safety profile commensurate with other sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2) inhibitors.

Expert opinion

In patients with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD, ertugliflozin appears safe with a noted non-significant trend toward improved renal outcomes. Approximately 23.7% of patients in the VERTIS-CV trial had heart failure, the highest among SGLT-2 inhibitor CVOTs. The VERTIS-CV trial reaffirms the reduction in heart failure hospitalizations as a likely class effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors. While the trial supports the use of ertugliflozin beyond glycemic control, agents with confirmed superiority for improved cardiovascular outcomes and mortality may be preferred.

KEYWORDS:

• Ertugliflozin
• SGLT-2 inhibitor
• cardiovascular outcomes
• renal outcomes
• type 2 diabetes

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript was not funded.