121
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effectiveness of a perioperative smoking cessation program evaluated over one-year follow-up

, , , , &
Pages 645-649 | Received 18 Aug 2020, Accepted 18 Jan 2021, Published online: 01 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyze the effects of an intervention protocol for perioperative smoking cessation on short- and long-term smoking abstinence of patients.

Methods: A total of 115 patients who were scheduled for ENT surgery were included in the study. The participants of the smoking cessation program were included in the study group, and subjects who smoke but have not heard about this program were included in the control group. Subjects who refused to participate in the smoking cessation program were included in the refusal group. The proportion of smoking cessation in each group was compared during the one-year follow-up.

Results: The trends of failure rate during the one-year follow-up were approximately the same among the groups, but the failure at 1 month postoperatively in the control group was more prominent than that in the study group. In the study group, subjects who maintained and did not maintain smoking cessation at 1 year postoperatively did not show any significant differences in terms of demographic data, smoking history, and perioperative parameters.

Conclusions: Results show that the smoking cessation program was effective, particularly in the early postoperative period. However, another program is needed for patients who failed to maintain smoking cessation during long-term follow-up.

Disclosure statement

The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions: DYL, SDK, HRJ, and YHJ: planned this study, collected data, performed the analysis, and wrote the article. KHK, and YHJ: participated in the discussions concerning the study design and data collection. JHL: planned this study, performed the analysis, interpreted the results, and wrote the article. All authors approved the final draft for submission.

Additional information

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.