ABSTRACT
Background
While preliminary evidence has begun to document intentional use of one substance to reduce the use of another, the phenomenon of drug substitution among people who use illicit opioids remains understudied. Therefore, we sought to estimate the prevalence and correlates of intentional substance use to reduce illicit opioid use among persons who use drugs (PWUD).
Methods
We analyzed data from three prospective cohorts of PWUD in Vancouver, Canada, using multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE).
Results
Between June 2012 and June 2016, 1527 participants were recruited and contributed 4991 interviews. Of those, 336 (22%) illicit opioid-using participants self-reported substitution to reduce illicit opioid use at least once during study period contributing 467 (9.4%) interviews. Among those interviews, substances substituted for opioids were alcohol (15 participants, 3.2%), stimulants (235, 50.3%), cannabis (129, 27.6%), benzodiazepines (21, 4.5%), and others (20, 4.3%). In multivariable GEE model adjusted for socio-demographic factors, reporting substitution to reduce illicit opioid use was positively associated with greater likelihood of daily cannabis use (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 1.56, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.24–1.96].
Conclusions
While daily cannabis use was associated with reporting opioid substitution attempts, additional study is needed to examine potential of cannabis/cannabinoids to reduce illicit opioid use.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the study participants for their contribution to the research, as well as current and past researchers and staff.
Disclosure statement
The University of British Columbia (UBC) has received an unstructured gift to support M.-J Milloy’s research from NG Biomed, Ltd., an applicant to the Canadian federal government for a license to produce medical cannabis. Dr. Milloy is the Canopy Growth professor of cannabis science at UBC, a position created by an unstructured gift to the university from Canopy Growth, a licensed producer of cannabis, and the Government of British Columbia’s Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions. No other potential conflict of interest interest was reported by the author(s).
Data statement
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.