1,527
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

FIFA and UEFA, a critical review of the two organizations through the lens of institutional theory and MacIntyre’s philosophical schema

&
 

ABSTRACT

FIFA and UEFA are the two major football institutions in the global and European level, respectively. The recent scandals in both organizations and especially in FIFA, raised again discussion about the nature of governance in football institutions. This study focuses for the first time on the assessment of both organizations by using the tenets of institutional theory and MacIntyre’s virtues-goods-practice-institution schema. Through a review of the history of FIFA and UEFA, we identified the role of the context, agents and ethics. Our analysis shows that while FIFA has developed very much in terms of power and influence, both the agents and institutional context, have played a key role in the creation of a culture of corruption. On the other hand, UEFA had to comply with a stricter regulative system and powerful stakeholders, while its major agents appear to be less affected by corrupt practices, compared to those of FIFA.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and feedback. Special thanks to Heather Reid, Panagiotis Michalis and Jim Parry for their time and their valuable insights.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Washington and Patterson, ‘Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research.’

2. Henry and Lee, ‘Governance and Ethics in Sport’; Geeraert, Alm and Groll, ‘Good Governance in International Sport Organizations: An Analysis of the 35 Olympic Sport Governing bodies’; and Geeraert, ‘Sports Governance Observer 2015: The legitimacy crisis in international sports Governance.’

3. Greenwood et al., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2.

4. Meyer and Rowan, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.’

5. DiMaggio and Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited’.

6. ‘Tolbert and Zucker, ‘Institutional sources of change in the Formal Structure of Organizations’; and Tina Dacin, Goodstein, and Scott, ‘Institutional Theory and Institutional Change’.

7. DiMaggio, ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’.

8. Greenwood et al., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 3.

9. Meyer and Rowan, ‘The Structure of Educational Organizations’, 84.

10. DiMaggio and Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited’.

11. Washington and Patterson, ‘Hostile Takeover or Joint Venture’, 4.

12. Ibid., 4.

13. Friedland and Alford, ‘Bringing Society Back in’.

14. Tost, ‘An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments’.

15. Meyer and Scott, ‘Organizational Environments’, 201.

16. DiMaggio, ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’; and Lawrence, ‘Institutional Strategy’.

17. Moore and Grandy, ‘Bringing Morality Back in’.

18. Munir, ‘A Loss of Power in Institutional Theory’.

19. Meyer and Rowan, ‘Institutionalized Organizations’.

20. MacIntyre, After Virtue, 26–27.

21. Ibid., 194.

22. Ibid., 187.

23. Ibid., 196.

24. McLeod, Payne and Evert, ‘Organizational Ethics Research’.

25. Nielsen and Massa, ‘Reintegrating Ethics and Institutional Theories’.

26. McCann and Brownsberger, ‘Management as a Social Practice; Brewer, ‘Management as a Practice’; Beadle and Moore, ‘MacIntyre on Virtue and Organization’; Dawson and Bartholomew, ‘Virtues, Managers and Business People’; and Dobson, ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s Aristotelian Business Ethics’.

27. Moore and Beadle, ‘In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business’.

28. Ibid., 16.

29. Neubert et al., ‘The Virtuous Influence of Ethical Leadership Behavior’.

30. Brown and Trevino, ‘Ethical Leadership’.

31. Wuthnow, Meaning and Moral Order.

32. Fiss, ‘Institutions and Corporate’, 390.

33. Ibid., 393.

34. Dietschy, ‘Making Football Global?ʹ

35. Tomlinson, ‘The Supreme Leader Sails On’.

36. Burlamaqui, ‘The ‘Invention’of FIFA History’.

37. Vonnard and Sbetti, ‘João Havelange’.

38. Arcioni, Bayle and Rayner, ‘Sepp Blatter’.

39. Tomlinson, ‘The Supreme Leader Sails On’, 1162.

40. Sugden and Tomlinson, ‘Power and Resistance in the Governance of World Football’; and Yallop, How They Stole the Game.

41. Jennings, ‘Investigating Corruption in Corporate Sport’.

42. Arcioni, Bayle and Rayner, ‘Sepp Blatter’, 38.

43. MacAloon, ‘Scandal and Governance’.

44. Washington and Patterson, ‘Hostile Takeover or Joint Venture’, 6.

45. Gammelsæter and Senaux, ‘The Governance of the Game’.

46. Chappelet, ‘Autonomy and Governance’.

47. Geeraert, ‘Football is War’, 141.

48. Ibid, 140.

49. Jennings, ‘Investigating Corruption in Corporate Sport’.

50. Sugden and Tomlinson, ‘Power and Resistance in the Governance of World Football’.

51. Mittag and Vonnard, ‘The Role of Societal Actors in Shaping a Pan-European Consciousness’.

52. Vieli, UEFA 60 Years at the Heart of Football, 62.

53. Holt, ‘UEFA, Governance, and the Control of Club Competition in European Football’, 31.

55. Vieli, UEFA 60 Years at the Heart of Football, 109.

56. García, ‘UEFA and the European Union’.

57. Forster, ‘Can Sport be Regulated by Europe’; and Garcia, ‘Sport Governance After the White Paper’.

58. Henry and Lee, ‘Governance and Ethics in Sport’.

59. Sugden, ‘Network football’, 70.

60. Peeters and Szymanski, ‘Financial Fair Play in European Football’.

61. Budzinski, ‘The Competition Economics of Financial Fair Play’.

62. Bairner and Darby, ‘The Swedish Model and International Sport’.

63. The guardian, Ángel María Villar resigns from Uefa and Fifa positions after arrest in Spain, https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jul/27/angel-maria-villar-resigns-uefa-fifa-spain, (accessed 20 January 2020).

64. Beadle and Moore, ‘MacIntyre, Neo-Aristotelianism and Organization Theory’.

65. Geeraert, Scheerder and Bruyninckx, ‘The Governance Network of European Football’.

66. Geeraert, ‘Football is War’, 140.

67. Zeidan and Fauser, ‘Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility’.

68. Moore, ‘Corporate Character’, 7.

69. McNamee, ‘Hubris, Humility, And Humiliation’, 38.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.