1,187
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Articles

Sport-for-development and social inclusion in caste-ridden India: opportunities and challenges

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

This paper explores how a sport-for-development soccer programme sought to create opportunities for social inclusion in low and high-caste social contexts in rural India. This study reveals that the caste system in India influences cultural, systemic and structural factors and that these factors influence both social inclusion and exclusion opportunities in India. Based on a series of data collected from multiple stakeholders, in a variety of contexts and using a qualitative research approach, this paper illustrates how opportunities for intragroup and intergroup participation and social interaction through a sport-for-development soccer programme can mitigate some of these caste-based structural factors that may inhibit social inclusion and facilitate opportunities for improved social inclusion for people from high and low caste communities. This paper includes recommendations for sport-for-development researchers and practitioners.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. The World Bank. India Overview.

2. Sugden, ‘Critical left-realism and sport interventions’.

3. Kidd, ‘A new social movement’; Coalter, ‘The politics of sport-for-development’.

4. Coalter, Wider Social Role.

5. Lyras and Peachey, ‘Integrating sport-for-development’.

6. Schulenkorf, ‘Sport events and ethnic reconciliation’; Sherry and Strybosch, ‘Kick in the right direction’; Block and Gibbs, ‘Promoting social inclusion’; Doidge, Marc and Elisa, ‘Active integration’: sport clubs taking an active role in the integration of refugees’.

7. Chelladurai, Shanmuganathan, Jaihind and Nageswaran., ‘Sport in Modern India’.

8. Bandyopadhyay, Scoring Off the Field.

9. Bandyopadhyay, Scoring Off the Field; Mangan, ‘Eton in India’; Mills, ‘Football in Goa’.

10. Bandyopadhyay, ‘Uncovering the Sleeping Giant syndrome

11. Bhan, ‘Sport as a vehicle of change for livelihoods’.

12. Bandyopadhyay, ‘The nation and its fragments’.

13. Bandyopadhyay, Scoring Off the Field; Majumdar, ‘The Vernacular in Sports History’.

14. Schulenkorf, Sherry, and Rowe, ‘Sport-for-Development’.

15. Bateman and Binns, ‘More than just a game’

16. Morgan, Parker, and Roberts, ‘Community sport programmes’.

17. Wankel and Berger, ‘Psychological and social benefits’.

18. De Knop et al., ‘Sport and ethnic’.

19. Block and Gibbs, ‘Promoting social inclusion’.

20. Richardson and Fletcher, ‘Community sport’.

21. Schulenkorf, ‘Sport events and ethnic reconciliation’.

22. Sherry, ‘(Re)engaging marginalized groups’.

23. Inoue and Forneris, ‘The role of special olympics’.

24. Toosi et al. ‘Dyadic interracial interactions’; Trawalter, Richeson and Shelton, Predicting behavior during interracial interactions’.

25. Hartmann and Kwauk, ‘Sport and development’.

26. Doidge, Marc and Elisa, ‘Active integration’: sport clubs taking an active role in the integration of refugees’

27. Bailey, ‘Evaluating the relationship’; Fraser-Thomas, Cote, and Deakin, ‘Youth sport programs’; Sandford, Armour, and Warmington, ‘Re‐engaging disaffected youth’; Bailey et al., ‘Educational benefits’; Coalter and Taylor, Sport-for-Development; Richardson and Fletcher, ‘Community sport’.

28. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

29. Pettigrew and Tropp, ‘Intergroup contact’.

30. Cunningham, Bopp, and Sagas, ‘Overcoming cultural barriers’.

31. Deshpande, ‘Caste still define disparity’; Banerjee, Iyer, and Somanathan, ‘History, social divisions’.

32. Beteille, ‘Varna and jati’.

33. Natrajan, The culturalization of caste in India.

34. Banerjee, Iyer, and Somanathan, ‘History, social divisions’.

35. Jaffrelot, ‘The rise of the other backward classes in the Hindi belt’.

36. Natrajan, The culturalization of caste in India.

37. Deshpande, ‘Caste still define disparity’

38. Berreman, ‘Caste in India’.

39. Bros, ‘Burden of caste’.

40. O’Reilly, ‘Social Inclusion Berreman’.

41. Levitas, The inclusive society; Murie and Sako, ‘Social exclusion and opportunity’.

42. Rycroft, ‘Looking beyond the present’.

43. Ibid.

44. Bros, ‘Burden of caste’.

45. Schulenkorf, ‘Sport events and ethnic reconciliation’; Sherry and Strybosch, ‘Kick in the right direction’; Block and Gibbs, ‘Promoting social inclusion’.

46. Schaillée, Haudenhuyse, and Bradt, ‘Community sport and social’.

47. Baum, MacDougall, and Smith. ‘Participatory action research’

48. Coalter, Wider Social Role.

49. Hartmann and Kwauk, ‘Sport and development’.

50. Sherry and Schulenkorf, ‘League Bilong Laif’; Spaaij, Oxford, and Jeanes, ‘Transforming communities’.

51. Spaaij, Oxford, and Jeanes, ‘Transforming communities’.

52. Reason and Bradbury, eds. Inquiry and Participation.

53. Brydon-Miller, Greenwood, and Maguire, ‘Why action research’.

54. McNiff and Whitehead, All You Need.

55. Kimchi, Polivka, and Stevenson, ‘Triangulation’.

56. Liamputtong, Qualitative Research Methods.

57. Minichiello, Aroni, and Hays, In-depth Interviewing.

58. DeCuir-Gunby, Marshall, and McCulloch, ‘Developing and using a codebook’.

59. Davey and Gordon, ‘Definitions of social inclusion’.

60. Bailey, ‘Physical education’.

61. Sandford, Armour, and Warmington, ‘Re‐engaging disaffected youth’.

62. Bateman and Binns, ‘More than just a game’.

63. Allman, ‘Sociology of social inclusion’.

64. Pettigrew and Tropp, ‘Intergroup contact’.

65. Morgan, Parker, and Roberts, ‘Community sport programmes’.

66. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

67. Hoff and Pandey, ‘Making up people’.

68. Bros, ‘Burden of caste’.

69. Toosi et al. ‘Dyadic interracial interactions’.

70. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

71. Armour and Rachel, ‘Positive youth development’

72. Winter, Major Themes and Debates.

73. Spaaij, ‘Building social and cultural capital’.

74. Cunningham, Bopp, and Sagas, ‘Overcoming cultural barriers’.

75. Small, ‘Understanding the social impacts’.

76. Schulenkorf, ‘Sport for development’.

77. Peachey et al., ‘Influence of a sport-for-peace’.

78. Hartmann, ‘Theorizing sport’.

79. Pettigrew et al., ‘Recent advances’.

80. Pettigrew and Tropp, ‘Intergroup contact’.

81. Wright et al., ‘Extended contact effect’.

82. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

83. Pettigrew, ‘Future directions’.

84. Pettigrew, ‘Racial integration’.

85. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

86. Coalter, Wider Social Role.

87. Hartmann and Kwauk, ‘Sport and development’.

88. Ibid.

89. Allport, Nature of Prejudice.

Additional information

Funding

The research work of this study was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. However, the authors received no financial support for the authorship, and/or publications of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.