441
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific papers

The role of predictive models for resilient modulus of unbound materials in pavement FWD-deflection assessment

, &
Pages 374-392 | Received 14 Jul 2017, Accepted 10 Jun 2018, Published online: 23 Jul 2018
 

Abstract

The unbound materials in pavements are stress dependent and any changes in the moisture content will change the stress level and, therefore, the material behaviour. The objectives of this paper are to 1) investigate the stress dependency coupled with moisture sensitivity of the unbound materials on the estimated in-situ Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) deflection response; and 2) determine the most appropriate resilient modulus predictive model to predict the stiffness of the unbound materials without conducting backcalculation analysis. In the proposed approach, one stress-based constitutive model and one approximate empirical predictive model were evaluated in conjunction with the predicted and measured soil moisture content profiles in eight different unbound material types. Measured FWD data at four Long-Term Pavement Performance-Seasonal Monitoring Programme (LTPP-SMP) locations in Maine, Minnesota, Texas and Montana were used to estimate the in situ measured deflection. Then, layer elastic analysis was conducted using the soil moisture profile, asphalt temperature, material physical properties, groundwater table and depth to bedrock to examine the sensitivity of each model in the pavement response. The findings show that for non-plastic soil materials, the presented empirical model is adequate to predict the in-situ FWD deflection. In contrast, both approximate and stress-dependent models overestimate the in-situ pavement surface deflection for the plastic soils evaluated in this study.

Acknowledgement

This research was primarily supported by the Federal Highway Administration under grant No. DTFH61-12-R-00055. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Additional information

Funding

This research was primarily supported by the Federal Highway Administration under [grant number DTFH61-12-R-00055].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.