Abstract
Cold recycled asphalt mixtures (CRAMs) may present a compressive resilient modulus dependent on the stress state. Currently, there is no widespread consensus on a triaxial resilient modulus (TxRM) model for CRAM analysis. A widely accepted TxRM model would favour the analysis of CRAM’s layered pavement systems. This paper assessed the adequacy of different TxRM models of CRAM’s specimens with different compositions, aggregate gradation and physical characteristics. Based on the literature, three different TxRM models were selected. The models’ non-linear estimation was performed through Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Model selection analysis was based on residuals square sum root (RSSR) assessment. Ni et al.’s model was found to be the most adequate for CRAM’s TxRM modelling based on RSSR analysis. The model selection was done regardless of aggregate gradation, binder type/content, air void content, RAP content, TxRM values range, active filler type and curing time of the tested specimens.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.