Publication Cover
Sex Education
Sexuality, Society and Learning
Volume 22, 2022 - Issue 3
1,270
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Relevant, relatable and reliable: rural adolescents’ sex education preferences

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 304-320 | Received 23 Oct 2020, Accepted 13 May 2021, Published online: 24 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Increases in STD cases in Indiana communities have led to questions about the sexual health of adolescents. School-based sex education can help teenagers adopt healthy attitudes and behaviours. Effective sex education programmes should involve learning from adolescents and young people about their health needs. Student voice, however, is generally absent in curriculum development. This study explored rural young people aged 14–18 years’ perceptions of current sex education; opinions about abstinence-only-until-marriage and comprehensive sex education (CSE) curricula; and preferences for future sex education development. Focus groups and surveys were used to elicit high school students’ opinions. Constant comparative approach was used for data contextualisation and theme identification.

Analysis revealed participants perceive that current sex education content does not relate to them; abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education is impractical either now or later; young people frequently resist abstinence-only-until-marriage education; students want information that helps keep them safe sexually. Taken together, study findings reveal ideal sex education curricula contain relevant, relatable and reliable information. Incorporating these ‘3Rs’ can help students better engage with and apply sex education information.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Christine Amidon, our study participants and the school officials who allowed us to conduct this study. This paper is dedicated to Wyona Young and Dianne Harris.

Disclosure statement

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by a service-learning grant from Purdue University (SLG #566).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.