419
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Traditions and contradictions of sexual function definitions for Portuguese heterosexual men and women: medicalization and socially constructed gender effects

, &
Pages 271-288 | Received 30 Jan 2015, Accepted 23 Aug 2015, Published online: 28 Sep 2015
 

ABSTRACT

Research on how sexual changes are understood as dysfunctions versus normal change remains scarce, namely in societies where traditional gender roles persist among the growing diversity of sexual relationships and practices. This article discusses controversies on sexual function definitions through sociology of diagnosis and sexual scripting theoretical frameworks, drawing on 313 structured interviews with primary healthcare users of the Greater Lisbon area, followed by in-depth interviews with a subsample of 25 heterosexual men and women. The low level of agreement found between the scores of the most widely used instruments for sexual function evaluation in epidemiology studies and self-diagnosis may be understood as a challenge for the predominant biomedical model and a need to re-conceptualize sexual dysfunctions other than as organic dysfunctions, with implications for both research and practice. Results show that individuals not only challenge illness concepts and sexual dysfunction diagnoses and their treatments, as they also construct sexual problems based on their impacts in daily life. Demonstrating the permanence of traditional social scripts that operate in the definitions of sexual function is one way to understand gender as an embodied social structure and get adequate practice to the problem, particularly in the Portuguese society where sexuality remains highly gendered.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank all the men and women who kindly participated in the study. We are grateful to the research team, especially Ana Beato, Ana Virgolino, Filipe Leão Miranda, Luis Roxo, Rui Simões, and Professor Alberto Galvão-Teles for all the support given to the research. Additional thanks go to Sofia Amador for providing us with valuable bibliographic references.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Violeta Alarcão

Violeta Alarcão is a sociologist, project manager and researcher at the Institute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Portugal.

Fernando Luís Machado

Fernando Luís Machado is an assistant professor of the Department of Sociologia of ISCTE, University Institute of Lisbon (CIES-IUL).

Alain Giami

Alain Giami is currently a research professor at the Inserm (National Institute of Health and Medical Research) in Paris, where he coordinates a research group on the relations between sexuality, medicine and gender issues.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.