786
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

On the importance of generating accurate turbulent boundary condition for unsteady simulations

, &
Article: N35 | Received 27 Feb 2011, Accepted 04 Aug 2011, Published online: 07 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

Turbulence is generally characterized by random, chaotic motion and has always been a challenging problem for fluid dynamists. Several methods for generating turbulent boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics are in use today. One of the methods is by adding random white-noise to the averaged velocity profiles to generate turbulence in the flow field, which can be considered as the simplest and inexpensive method. Recently, another method has been introduced, which is based upon a digital filter to generate turbulent inflow data. This paper presents a comparison of the digital filter-based turbulent inflow data generation technique with three different methods within the framework of the large eddy simulations technique using the fifth- and second-order accurate methods in space and time, respectively. The case for comparison/analysis is a sonic jet of air injected transversely into a supersonic (Mach 1.6) stream of air, for which experimental and classical large eddy simulation data were available. It is demonstrated that the random white-noise-based turbulent inflow data dissipate immediately in the computational domain, giving incorrect velocity and pressure profiles. At the same time, the importance of two-point Exponential correlation used in the digital filter-based technique is demonstrated by scaling the random white-noise with the Reynolds stress tensor and ignoring the correlation. This improved the results compared with pure random white-noise, but still exhibits a high initial dissipation rate because the energy is not distributed over the required range of wavenumbers. It is demonstrated that the digital filter-based turbulent inflow data generation technique provides a reliable, accurate and consistent turbulent boundary layer in the flow field, which is required for the capture of correct flow physics. It is also demonstrated that the computational cost involved in all the methods presented is almost identical.

Acknowledgements

The simulations presented in this paper have been carried out on the Cranfield University's Astral supercomputer. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for this project from EPSRC under the Doctoral Training Accounts (DTA) scheme.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.