A numerical study of rotation effects on jets effusing from inclined holes into a cross-flow

Abstract

In this work, the complexity of the flow field arising from the impact of the interaction of coolant jets with a hot cross-flow under rotation conditions was numerically simulated using large eddy simulation with artificial inflow boundary condition. The finite-volume method and the unsteady PISO (Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operators) algorithm were applied on a non-uniform staggered grid. The simulations were performed for four different values of rotation number (Ro) of 0.0, 0.03021, 0.06042, and 0.12084, a jet Reynolds number of 4700, based on the hole width and the jet exit velocity. The air jet was injected at 30° and 90° in the streamwise direction with a density ratio of 1.04 and a velocity ratio of 0.5. The flow fields of the present study were compared with experimental data in order to validate the reliability of the LES technique. It was shown that the rotation has a strong impact on the jet trajectory behaviour and the film cooling effectiveness. The film trajectory always inclines centrifugally. Under rotating conditions, the film trajectory departs from the centreline to the left boundary. The deflection becomes greater as Ro increases. Furthermore, it was also found that the injection angle has a strong impact on separation and reattachment behaviour as well as the strength of the penetration into the cross-flow. As it increases, the distribution of the film cooling downstream the jet exit is more non-uniform and the film cooling effectiveness level slightly decreases.

Keywords:

• jet into cross-flow
• rotation
• large eddy simulation
• film cooling effectiveness

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance given by IT Services and the use of the Computational Shared Facility at the University of Manchester. Also, the financial support from the Higher Committee for Education Development in Iraq and University of Kufa is greatly acknowledged.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.