762
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Large eddy simulations and parameterisation of roughness element orientation and flow direction effects in rough wall boundary layers

&
Pages 1072-1085 | Received 11 Jun 2016, Accepted 15 Jul 2016, Published online: 11 Aug 2016
 

ABSTRACT

We conduct a series of large eddy simulations (LES) of turbulent boundary layers over arrays of cuboidal roughness elements at arbitrary orientation angles (non-frontal orientations with the incident flow). Flow response to changing roughness orientation is systematically studied at two ground coverage densities, λp = 0.06 and 0.11. As expected, the effective roughness heights zo measured from LES are higher for λp = 0.11 than for λp = 0.06, although appreciable changes both in zo and wall shear stress (friction velocity) are observed at both ground coverage densities as the roughness orientation angle changes. This suggests the necessity of accounting for detailed rough wall topology (including more information than just λp, λf) when relating rough wall morphology to its aerodynamic properties. To this end, a recently developed analytical rough wall parameterisation is used to predict the aerodynamic properties of the simulated rough surfaces. In this rough wall model, wake interactions among roughness elements are explicitly modelled using the concept of sheltering height and exponential attenuation coefficient. As a result, the parameterisation is responsive to detailed ground roughness arrangements and flow conditions, including roughness height variations, element orientation, incident flow direction, transverse displacements, etc. Model-predicted effective roughness heights, wall stress, mean velocity at the height of the roughness, and in some cases displacement height, are compared against the LES measurements from this study as well as numerical/experiment measurements from other authors. The predictions from the model are found to agree well with the measurements both in trends and in absolute values, thus extending the applicability of the analytical rough wall model to more general surfaces than those previously tested.

Acknowledgments

The authors are pleased to dedicate this work to Prof. Javier Jimenez acknowledging his seminal contributions to the science of wall-bounded turbulence, and to congratulate him on the occasion of his 70th birthday. The authors thank the Office of Naval Research (Dr R. Joslin, program director) for financial support, and R. Mittal and J. Sadique for generous help and fruitful discussions. Simulations were performed using the DoD system.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by Office of Naval Research [grant number N00014-12-1-0582].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.