200
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 311-329 | Received 06 Nov 2022, Accepted 17 May 2023, Published online: 19 Jun 2023
 

Abstract

The strong increase in computational power observed during the last few years has allowed to use Large Eddy Simulation (LES) for industrial configurations. Nevertheless, the time-to-solution is still too large for a daily use in the design phases. The objective of this work is to develop a new time integration method to reduce the time-to-solution of LES of incompressible flows by allowing the use of larger time step. The projection method, probably the most commonly used method in the context of LES of incompressible flow, is generally applied using explicit time advancement which constrains the time-step value for stability reasons (CFL and Fourier constraints). The time step can then be small with respect to the physical characteristic times of the studied flow. In this case, an implicit time advancement method, which is unconditionally stable, can be used. However, this leads to non-linear resolution of momentum equation which can strongly increase time-to-solution because of non-linear iterations inside a physical iteration. To relax the stability constraints while minimising the computational cost of an iteration, a linearised implicit time advancement based on Backward Differentiation Formula (BDF) scheme is proposed in this work. The linearisation is performed using an extrapolated velocity field based on the previous fields. This time integration is first evaluated on a turbulent pipe test case. It is observed a time-to-solution up to five times lower than the explicit time integration while keeping the same accuracy in terms of mean and fluctuating velocity fields. To incorporate this new time advancement method in the automatic mesh convergence developed in Part I, a time-step control method based on the local truncation error is used. The resulting automatic time-step and mesh procedure is evaluated on a turbulent round jet case and on PRECCINSTA configuration, a swirl burner which is a representative case of an industrial aeronautical injection system. This new procedure leads to a time-to-solution up to three times lower than the previous procedure, presented in Part I.

Acknowledgement

This work was granted access to the HPC resources of CINES/TGCC/IDRIS under the projects 2B06880 and 2A00611 made by GENCI. Part of this work has been initiated during the Extreme CFD Workshop & Hackathon (https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 This could directly be done in the first step for the Euler method, but not for Runge–Kutta methods of order greater than 1.

Additional information

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from NETHUNS project under grant ANR-21-CHIN-0001-01 and from the Hydro'Like industrial chair.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.