Abstract
The present paper analyses the forecastability and tradability of volatility on the large S&P500 index and the liquid SPY ETF, VIX index and VXX ETN. Even though there is already a huge array of literature on forecasting high frequency volatility, most publications only evaluate the forecast in terms of statistical errors. In practice, this kind of analysis is only a minor indication of the actual economic significance of the forecast that has been developed. For this reason, in our approach, we also include a test of our forecast through trading an appropriate volatility derivative. As a method we use parametric and artificial intelligence models. We also combine these models in order to achieve a hybrid forecast. We report that the results of all three model types are of similar quality. However, we observe that artificial intelligence models are able to achieve these results with a shorter input time frame and the errors are uniformly lower comparing with the parametric one. Similarly, the chosen models do not appear to differ much while the analysis of trading efficiency is performed. Finally, we notice that Sharpe ratios tend to improve for longer forecast horizons.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank participants at the Forecasting Financial Markets (FFM 2016), Quantitative Finance and Risk Analysis (QFRA2016) conferences, and at seminar talks in the University of Liverpool and Leibniz Universität Hannover. Remaining errors are ours.
Notes
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
1 For determining whether an asset return process has jumps by using high frequency data (see Carr and Wu Citation2003, Andersen et al. Citation2003, Citation2007a, Citationb, Citation2012, Huang and Tauchen Citation2005, Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard Citation2006, Fan and Wang Citation2007, Lee and Mykland Citation2008, Jiang and Oomen Citation2008, Aït-Sahalia and Jacod Citation2009, Lee and Hannig Citation2010, Christensen et al. Citation2014, Bajgrowicz et al. Citation2016).
2 In (Hyndman and Koehler (Citation2006), and references therein), there is an interesting discussion and comparison among different measures of accuracy of univariate time series forecasts.
Carr, P. and Wu, L., What type of process underlies options? A simple robust test. J. Financ., 2003, 58, 2581–2610. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P., Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 2003, 71, 579–625. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Diebold, F.X., Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modelling, and forecasting of return volatility. Rev. Econ. Stat., 2007a, 89, 701–720. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Dobrev, D., No-arbitrage semimartingale restrictions for continuous-time volatility models subject to leverage effects, jumps and i.i.d. noise: Theory and testable distributional implications. J. Economet., 2007b, 138, 125–180. Andersen, T.G., Dobrev, D. and Schaumburg, E., Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbour truncation. J. Economet., 2012, 169, 75–93. Huang, X. and Tauchen, G., The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance. J Financ. Economet., 2005, 3, 456–499. Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E. and Shephard, N., Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. J. Financ. Economet., 2006, 4, 1–30. Fan, J. and Wang, Y., Multi-scale jump and volatility analysis for high-frequency financial data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2007, 102, 1349–1362. Lee, S.S. and Mykland, P.A., Jumps in financial markets: A new nonparametric test and jump dynamics. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2008, 21, 2535–2563. Jiang, G.J. and Oomen, R., Testing for jumps when asset prices are observed with noise - A swap variance approach. J. Economet., 2008, 144, 352–370. Aït-Sahalia, Y. and Jacod, J., Testing for jumps in a discretely observed process. Ann. Stat., 2009, 37, 184–222. Lee, S.S. and Hannig, J., Detecting jumps from Levy jump diffusion processes. J. Financ. Econ., 2010, 96, 271–290. Christensen, K., Oomen, R.C.A. and Podolskij, M., Fact or friction: Jumps at ultra high frequency. J. Financ. Econom., 2014, 114, 576–599. Bajgrowicz, P., Scaillet, O. and Treccani, A., Jumps in high-frequency data: Spurious detections, dynamics, and news. Manag. Sci., 2016, 62, 2198–2217. Hyndman, R.J. and Koehler, A.B., Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int. J. Forecasting, 2006, 22, 679–688. Additional information
Funding
This work was supported by the EPSRC and ESRC Centre for Doctoral Training on Quantification and Management of Risk & Uncertainty in Complex Systems & Environments (EP/L015927/1).