1,115
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks

Pages 69-82 | Published online: 17 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study into the quality of peer feedback provided by students within a computerised peer‐assessment environment. The study looks at the creation of a ‘feedback index’ that represents the quality of an essay based upon the feedback provided during a peer‐marking process and identifies a significant positive correlation between this index and the average marks produced for an essay. The data produced are analysed in an attempt to ascertain whether specific groups of students, based upon their ability in developing an essay within this subject area, in general tend to mark and/or comment on their peers either too generously or too critically.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to recognise the input from the editor responsible for handling this paper (Philip Barker) and also the editors and audience from the original presentation of a subset of this data at the ALT‐C 2003 conference (Davies, Citation2003b).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.