ABSTRACT
Despite its lengthy history and relatively stable structure, evidence shows that the US system of doctoral education has been in a continual state of change. This change is reflected in disciplinary contexts, student demographics, professional outcomes, and the investment of external stakeholders. While the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted issues of concern and weakness in the system, change elements have existed for some time. First, the cost that some individual students pay for their doctoral degree, resulting in high debt and low salary, requires attention. Second, the importance of international students to the system has not been met by corresponding federal immigration policies and support mechanisms. Third, many doctoral programmes are still designed as if students will secure a permanent faculty role after graduation. The change in the academic labour market has not been matched by a change in the doctoral curriculum. This article considers the issues and related influences.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Karri A. Holley
Karri Holley is Professor of Higher Education at The University of Alabama. Her articles have been included in Educational Researcher, Higher Education, Innovative Higher Education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Studies in Higher Education and Journal of Higher Education. She currently works on several grant-funded projects focused on interdisciplinary graduate education, degree completion in STEM fields, international higher education development, and education evaluation.