228
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Ultra-low dose rituximab for refractory pemghigus vulgaris: a pilot study

, , &
Pages 673-678 | Received 07 Oct 2019, Accepted 05 Feb 2020, Published online: 13 Feb 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Pemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune blistering disease affecting the skin and mucous membranes. Current treatments for pemphigus vulgaris include anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. However, the optimal dosage of rituximab for the treatment of this autoimmune bullous disease has not been clearly defined.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of an ultra-low dosage regimen of rituximab for pemphigus vulgaris.

Methods: We performed a prospective non-randomized open case series including eight patients affected by pemphigus vulgaris. Patients were treated with an ultra-low dosage of rituximab (a single infusion of 200 mg).

Results: All patients had a positive response after infusion. At the end of the follow-up period, 5 patients achieved a complete remission and 3 a partial remission. Except for one case of sepsis due to Citrobacer freundii and a pneumonia due to Haemophilus influenzae, no adverse events were documented in our patients.

Conclusions: Data from our study suggest that an ultra-low dosage of rituximab could be an effective treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Consequently, there is a need for a larger, confirmatory, randomized, multicenter trial.

Author contributions

MA conception and design of the study; IR, SM, AS, MA analysis and interpretation of the data; IR, SM, AS, MA drafting of the paper and revising it critically for intellectual content. All authors have approved the final draft submitted.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.