1,196
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Profile

Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1069-1076 | Received 25 Apr 2018, Accepted 12 Sep 2018, Published online: 21 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Since 2007 Sorafenib has represented the only approved drug for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib, an orally active inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–4, PDGFRa, RET and KIT), showed preclinical and clinical activity in the treatment of solid tumors, including HCC.

Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the current therapeutic paradigm for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC, focusing on Lenvatinib pre-clinical and clinical development. Keywords ‘Lenvatinib’, ‘ Target therapy’, ‘REFLECT trial’, ‘Hepatocellular carcinoma’, ‘HCC’, ‘Sorafenib’ were used for literature search on PubMed.

Expert commentary: In Phase-III multicentric REFLECT trial Lenvatinib demonstrated a non-inferior overall survival (OS) compared to Sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC, with a manageable toxicity profile, becoming a valid alternative option in the therapeutic repertoire of this disease. Nevertheless, the potential role of Lenvatinib in real-life clinical practice has still to be defined, especially in the light of the positive results that have been achieved with other new therapeutic agents (e.g. immunotherapy).

Information resources

  • Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine, 359(4), 378–390 (2008).

  • Ikeda K, Kudo M, Kawazoe S et al. Phase 2 study of lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of gastroenterology, 52(4), 512–519 (2017).

  • Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S et al. Lenvatinib versus Sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet, (2018).

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose

Notes on contributors

All authors conceived and designed the manuscript. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the article. All authors revised it critically for important intellectual content and finally approved the version to be submitted.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript was not funded

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.