101
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meeting Report

2024 ASCO genitourinary cancers symposium: a focus on renal cell carcinoma

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 657-660 | Received 16 Feb 2024, Accepted 17 Jun 2024, Published online: 27 Jun 2024
 

ABSTRACT

In this article, we report the breakthrough acquisitions for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. The results from Keynote 564 showed an impressive overall survival (OS) advantage for pembrolizumab, in patients at higher risk of relapse after surgery and confirmed the benefit in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). Until now, pembrolizumab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to prove a survival advantage. On the contrary, the results from CheckMate 914 trial showed the lack of benefit of adjuvant nivolumab. In the metastatic setting, the longer-term follow-up data of the CheckMate 9ER and CheckMate 214 trials reassessed the undoubtable role of ICI-based combination in first-line treatment, with a clear survival advantage in the subgroup of patients at intermediate/poor IMDC prognosis. No OS advantage was seen in favorable IMDC risk group patients. This 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium laid the foundations for further knowledge development necessary for an increasingly personalized therapy for RCC patients.

Declaration of Interest

C Ciccarese is an occasional consultant for Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, and Astellas and is supported by cancer research AIRC – MFAG, Rif. 29275. R Iacovelli is an advisory board member for Astellas, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, and a consultant for Astellas, Eisai, MSD, and Pfizer. G Tortora reports being a consultant for BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Servier, Merck Serono, Dompé. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.